Judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada

 
Citation:Public Service Alliance of Canada v. Canada, 2006 SCC 29, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 1027
Date:June 23, 2006
Docket: 30805
Other formats: PDF WPD
Printer Friendly

 

                                                SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

 

 

Citation: Public Service Alliance of Canada v. Canada, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 1027, 2006 SCC 29

 

Date:  20060623

Docket:  30805

 

Between:

Her Majesty The Queen

Appellant

and

Public Service Alliance of Canada

Respondent

- and -

Attorney General of Nova Scotia,

Attorney General of New Brunswick,

Attorney General of British Columbia,

Attorney General for Saskatchewan,

Attorney General of Alberta,

Canadian Union of Public Employees,

Alberta Urban Municipalities Association,

Union of British Columbia Municipalities

and Commissionaires Canada

Interveners

 

Coram: McLachlin C.J. and Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron and Rothstein JJ.

 

 

Reasons for judgment:

(paras. 1-3)

 

 

 

McLachlin C.J. (Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron and Rothstein JJ. concurring)

 

______________________________


Public Service Alliance of Canada v. Canada, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 1027, 2006 SCC 29

 

Her Majesty The Queen                                                                                 Appellant

 

v.

 

Public Service Alliance of Canada                                                               Respondent

 

and

 

Attorney General of Nova Scotia,

Attorney General of New Brunswick,

Attorney General of British Columbia,

Attorney General for Saskatchewan,

Attorney General of Alberta,

Canadian Union of Public Employees,

Alberta Urban Municipalities Association,

Union of British Columbia Municipalities

and Commissionaires Canada                                                                       Interveners

 

Indexed as: Public Service Alliance of Canada v. Canada

 

Neutral citation:  2006 SCC 29.

 

File No.:  30805.

 

2006:  June 23.

 

Present:  McLachlin C.J. and Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron and Rothstein JJ.

 

 


on appeal from the federal court of appeal

 

Police — Royal Canadian Mounted Police — Civilian staff — Police services agreements with municipalities — Civilian staff appointed or employed by municipalities under agreements not required to be federal public servants — Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. R-10, ss. 10, 20.

 

Statutes and Regulations Cited

 

Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. R‑10, ss. 10, 20.

 

APPEAL from a judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal (Décary, Sharlow and Malone JJ.A.), [2005] 3 F.C.R. 443, 249 D.L.R. (4th) 292, 329 N.R. 261, [2005] F.C.J. No. 11 (QL), 2005 FCA 5, setting aside a decision of Lemieux J. (2004), 244 F.T.R. 190, [2004] F.C.J. No. 13 (QL), 2004 FC 13.  Appeal allowed.

 

Alain Préfontaine, for the appellant.

 

David Yazbeck, for the respondent.

 

Written submissions only by Edward A. Gores, for the intervener the Attorney General of Nova Scotia.

 

John G. Furey, for the intervener the Attorney General of New Brunswick.

 

 


Nancy E. Brown, for the intervener the Attorney General of British Columbia.

 

Written submissions only by Graeme G. Mitchell, Q.C., for the intervener the Attorney General for Saskatchewan.

 

Kurt J. W. Sandstrom, for the intervener the Attorney General of Alberta.

 

John Elder and Susan D. Coen, for the intervener the Canadian Union of Public Employees.

 

Colin R. Fetter and Jeffrey W. Beedell, for the intervener the Alberta Urban Municipalities Association.

 

Peter A. Gall, Q.C., and Nitya Iyer, for the intervener the Union of British Columbia Municipalities.

 

David K. Law and Sophie Gagnier, for the intervener Commissionaires Canada.

 

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

 

1                                   The Chief Justice — It is not necessary to hear from counsel for the appellant or the interveners.

 


2                                   We are all of a view that s. 10 of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. R‑10, applies to the civilian staff appointed and employed by the RCMP Commissioner and that it does not apply to the civilian staff appointed or employed by a municipality under an agreement entered into by the Solicitor General pursuant to s. 20 of the Act.

 

3                                   The appeal is therefore allowed with costs throughout.

 

Judgment accordingly.

 

Solicitor for the appellant: Deputy Attorney General of Canada, Ottawa.

 

Solicitors for the respondent:  Raven, Cameron, Ballantyne & Yazbeck, Ottawa.

 

Solicitor for the intervener the Attorney General of Nova Scotia: Department of Justice, Halifax.

 

Solicitor for the intervener the Attorney General of New Brunswick:  Attorney General of New Brunswick, Fredericton.

 

Solicitor for the intervener the Attorney General of British Columbia:  Ministry of Attorney General, Victoria.

 

Solicitor for the intervener the Attorney General for Saskatchewan:  Attorney General for Saskatchewan, Regina.


 

Solicitor for the intervener the Attorney General of Alberta: Alberta Justice, Edmonton.

 

Solicitor for the intervener the Canadian Union of Public Employees:  Canadian Union of Public Employees, Ottawa.

 

Solicitors for the intervener the Alberta Urban Municipalities Association:  Brownlee, Edmonton.

 

Solicitors for the intervener the Union of British Columbia Municipalities:  Heenan Blaikie, Vancouver.

 

Solicitors for the intervener Commissionaires Canada:  Emond Harnden, Ottawa.