Judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada

 
Citation:R. v. Video World Ltd., [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1255
Date:June 25, 1987
Docket: 19537
Other formats: PDF WPD
Printer Friendly

R. v. Video World Ltd., [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1255

 

Video World Ltd.  Appellant

 

v.

 

Her Majesty The Queen                                                                  Respondent

 

indexed as: r. v. video world ltd.

 

File No.: 19537.

 

1987: June 3; 1987: June 25.

 


Present: Beetz, McIntyre, Lamer, Wilson, Le Dain, La Forest and L'Heureux‑Dubé JJ.

 

 

on appeal from the court of appeal for manitoba

 

                  Criminal law ‑‑ Obscenity ‑‑ Video cassettes ‑‑ Contemporary community standards test applied.

 

                  Held: The appeal should be dismissed.

 

Cases Cited

 

                  Applied: Towne Cinema Theatres Ltd. v. The Queen, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 494.

 

 

                  APPEAL from a judgment of the Manitoba Court of Appeal (1985), 36 Man. R. (2d) 68, 22 C.C.C. (3d) 331, allowing the Crown's appeal from an acquittal by Lismer Prov. Ct. J. (1985), 32 Man. R. (2d) 41 on the charge of unlawful circulation of an obscene video cassette and possessing a number of obscene video cassettes for the purpose of circulation. Appeal dismissed.

 

                  Robert Tapper, for the appellant.

 

                  Wayne Myshkowsky, for the respondent.

 

                  The following is the judgment delivered by

 

1.               The Court‑‑The appellant was charged before a Provincial Court Judge of Manitoba with unlawful circulation of an obscene video cassette and with possessing a number of obscene video cassettes for the purpose of circulation. The Provincial Court Judge entered an acquittal. This acquittal was reversed by the Manitoba Court of Appeal. This appeal comes to us as of right.

 

2.               The principles applicable to the facts of this case have been set out in the judgment of this Court in Towne Cinema Theatres Ltd. v. The Queen, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 494. We are all of the view that, under those principles, this appeal fails and the conviction entered by the Manitoba Court of Appeal stands.

 

                  Appeal dismissed.

 

                  Solicitors for the appellant: Wolch, Pinx, Tapper & Scurfield, Winnipeg.

 

                  Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General of Manitoba.